Is it me, or is there just no way that you can display snow depths on a map using the Met Office WOW system? I’ve never used the system in anger many times myself, and realise we don’t get much snow in this country, but not being to plot snow depths on a map seems a bit of a glaring omission to me. It certainly would be very useful at the moment with so much snow lying across the country, let me know what I’m missing or not doing right.
You really couldn’t make this up, but today’s full moon will be depending on your location:
- A wolf moon – because I’m reliably informed that’s what they call full moons that occur in January.
- A blue moon – because it’s the second full moon in a month although this is open to debate because over the years the original idea has been lost.
- A blood moon – because in some parts of the world a partial lunar eclipse will occur, and turn the blue moon a little bit redder. I always thought blue and red made green so who knows. Unfortunately the eclipse won’t be visible in the UK, because the skies will be perversely clear for once.
- A supermoon – because the moon will be around 7% closer than normal and 30% brighter.
The other interesting thing is that because of the blue moon in January, February 2018 won’t see a full moon, and that only happens four times each century.
During tomorrow it’s certainly set to become very windy and wet over large parts of the British Isles, but I have my eye set on developments during Friday and into Saturday, which if they pan out as the GFS suggests, might well bring a spell of snow to central and eastern counties before the deepening low exits into the North Sea during Saturday morning. Gradients around the low tighten considerably, even if a lot of that gradient can be discounted because of cyclonic curvature (fig 1).
The only thing I can get out of the Met Office is this T+120 image (PPVO89.tif) for the same time (fig 2). The Met Office model is much faster with this feature, and the low ends up being much more elongated and +5 hPa shallower than in the GFS.
Somewhere in the UK could see a maximum temperature as high as 20°C this afternoon, in the super mild air behind the warm front that’s pushed northeastward across the country today. The all time maximum according to TORRO for the 24th of October is 21.7°C at Prestatyn in Denbighshire so that looks safe.
I installed Thunderbird on my computer a few weeks ago, after using Microsoft Outlook as my email client of choice for many year. For some reason Thunderbird flags absolutely everything that I receive from the Met Office as junk, and labels each message ‘This message may be scam’ in red. I can’t help wondering if Mozilla know something I don’t know about the organisation! By the way I’m rather impressed with Thunderbird and wished that I’d made the change much sooner, best as well as being free it’s not cloud based!
I notice that there are a couple of reports of gusts to 64 knots along the south coast of Ireland at 09 UTC. That’s hurricane force 12 on the Beaufort scale for mean wind speeds (fig 1). I notice that at the Weather buoy K1 last hour there was a wave height of 11.1 metres (>36 feet) reported, the pressure has now bounced back there amazingly from when Ophelia passed close by to the west or to the east (fig 2).
I get the feeling from the latest 08 UTC observations (fig 1) that Ophelia might be staying just that little bit further west than was expected yesterday. Storm force gusts across the southwest of Ireland and the Scilly Isles.
It’s very easy today to find the cold-warm front strung out across northern England and central Ireland on just temperature alone (fig 1).
The temperature at Hawarden in Flintshire and Rostherne in Cheshire are already around 19°C, which wasn’t particularly difficult, as they didn’t fall below 17°C overnight (fig 2). But it’s another very mild day across all southern areas again today.
There is a possibility that if somewhere gets a maximum higher than 23.0°C early this afternoon, we’ll see a new record warmest 14th of October (fig 3). The extremes for the 14th to the 17th all look a little weak and vulnerable, and it maybe that we see more records broken tomorrow before Ophelia’s cold front finally sweeps through on Monday. I am grateful for the TORRO web page on daily extremes for the UK, why can’t the Met Office maintain a list of daily extremes for the UK like this? Oh silly me, I know why, they won’t make any money out of it.
TORRO don’t mention when their listing of extreme high and low daily temperatures started, but I notice that there are records from the 1880’s in the list, so it’s safe to assume that they began in the same year that the monthly weather reports started publication in January 1884, or maybe even a few years earlier.
Looking at the latest yellow warnings issued this morning for strong winds and heavy rain later on Tuesday and Wednesday, the Chief forecaster at the Met Office thinks that the likelihood of rainfall, is higher than that of strong winds (fig 1). This is a curious decision on his part, because if anything I would have thought that it was the other way round, and that the likelihood of strong winds were just if not more likely, than that of heavy rain alone. But the Chief does think, that any impacts from the strong winds are higher than the impact from heavy rain (fig 1).
I think this is a game that they play using the impact/likelihood grid that determines if a storm is to be named. As far as I can see, if they issue two alerts or more, and they’re both amber, then the storm will be named, but I’m unclear if just one of them being amber would trigger the naming process.
The rain from the warm and cold fronts fairly zips across the country, but the occlusion sticks around a while across southern Scotland and hence the limited area for the heavy rain warning. According to the latest T+48 forecast chart that I can access from Met Office, it looks like they see the tightest gradients being from the Midlands and Northern England, I can’t see why they’ve taken the yellow warnings area as far north as Edinburgh, but without their model data it’s impossible to say. Obviously they’ve included gusts to 75 mph that may occur down the lee side of the Pennines.
The Met Office have forgotten to label the central pressure of ‘Sebastian’ (the name already given it by BIM) on their T+48 chart (fig 3), which I reckon is somewhere around 980 hPa. The UKMO solution is very similar to that of the GFS (fig 4), the only real difference is that the tightest gradients lie south of northern England, and across most of the Midlands and southern England. It will be interesting to see if this area gets adjusted southwards in the next 24 hours.